IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MONTEZ RASHAAD WILLIAMS BEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 19-cv-585-NJR ) ) JOHN R. BALDWIN, ) TRAVIS BAYLER, ) CHRISTINE N. BRANNON, ) WARDEN HAMILTON, ) TODD A. PUSTELNIK, ) HASSAN MARRAR, ) MARK SCHULTE, ) ANDREW ZICKERT, ) and NICOLE GENISIO, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Montez Rashaad Williams Bey filed this action pursuant to

seeking relief for deprivations of his constitutional rights. The Complaint did not survive screening because Plaintiff failed to state a claim (Doc. 9). On August 23, 2019, the Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Plaintiff was granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint on or before September 20, 2019 (Doc. 9, p. 7). He was warned that the case would be dismissed with prejudice if he failed to take any action by that deadline. Plaintiff missed the deadline. More than a week has passed since it expired, and Plaintiff has not requested an extension or filed an Amended Complaint. The Court will not allow this matter to linger indefinitely. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, based on Plaintiffs failure to comply with the Court’s Order (Doc. 9) to file a First Amended Complaint and to prosecute his claims. FED. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan,

(7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga,

(7th Cir. 1994). This shall count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff is further advised that his obligation to pay the filing fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed. Therefore, the filing fee of $350.00 remains due and payable. See

(a)(1); Lucien v. Jockisch,

(7th Cir. 1998). If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this Order, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within thirty days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1)(A). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. See Fed. R. App. 3(e);

(e)(2); Ammons v. Gerlinger,

(7th Cir. 2008); Sloan v. Lesza,

(7th Cir. 1999); Lucien,

. He must list each of the issues he intends to appeal in the notice of appeal and his motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). A proper and timely motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) may toll the 30-day appeal deadline. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A Rule 59(e) motion must be filed no more than twenty-eight (28) days after the entry of judgment, and this 28-day deadline cannot be extended. The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 10/3/2019 Tl NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL Chief U.S. District Judge