Buckley v. Crammer

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Buckley v. Crammer

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SHAWN BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 18-cv-518-JPG-GCS

OFFICER COOK, OFFICER PHILLIPS, OFFICER ROSS, OFFICER HAWKINS, and OFFICER SNYDER,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 40) of Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison recommending that the Court grant the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34). No party has objected to the Report. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp.,

170 F.3d 734

, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby: • ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 40); • GRANTS the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34); and • DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 5, 2019 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown