Suttle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEBRA ANN SUTTLE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL NO. 19-cv-623-DGW1 ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. 27).
The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See, Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan, 195 F.3d 975, 978 (7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302- (1993).
The parties agree that, upon remand, “Plaintiff have the opportunity for a new hearing, and the ALJ will: (1) further evaluate the medical evidence, including This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). See, Doc. 15. medical opinion evidence; (2) reassess Plaintiffs residual functional capacity; (3) if necessary, obtain evidence from a medical expert; (4) if necessary, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert; and (5) issue a new decision.
Plaintiff applied for disability benefits in January 2016. (Tr. 72). While recognizing that the agency has a full docket, the Court urges the Commissioner to expedite this case on remand.
For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 27) is GRANTED.
The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiffs application for social security disability benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 15, 2020.
DONALD G. WILKERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.