Taylor v. Sarah

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Taylor v. Sarah

Trial Court Opinion

BAN INR ERM TELE ES ININ A NN NE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KENNADO K. TAYLOR, #M235370, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-01361-NJR v. NURSE SARAH, et al., Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: On May 12, 2020, Taylor’s motions for leave to proceed in form pauperis (“IFP”) were denied as he has “struck out” under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g) and did not meet the requirements of the imminent danger exception (Doc. 26). Taylor was ordered to pay the filing fee of $400.00 on or before June 3, 2020, and was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

Id.

To date, Taylor has failed to pay the filing fee. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. See FED. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan,

128 F.3d 1051

(7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga,

34 F.3d 466

(7th Cir. 1994). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 11, 2020 Tee foe teg NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL Chief U.S. District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown