District Court, S.D. Illinois, 2020

Harrison v. Sproul

Harrison v. Sproul
District Court, S.D. Illinois · Decided June 16, 2020
Harrison v. Sproul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BERTRAM HARRISON, #29437-018 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL NO. 20-425-NJR ) WARDEN SPROUL, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: On May 7, 2020, Petitioner Harrison was ordered to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this case to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days (on or before June 8, 2020) (Doc. 2). He was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action. Id. To date, Harrison has failed to pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Thus, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). Harrison’s obligation to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); Lucien v. Jockisch, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1998).

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 16, 2020 s/ Nancy J. Rosenstengel NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL Chief U.S. District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.