Brown v. Illinois

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Brown v. Illinois

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ANTHONY BROWN, #K04318, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 19-cv-01401-SMY ) STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court for case management. Plaintiff Anthony Brown, formerly an inmate of the Illinois Department of Corrections,1 filed this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. The Complaint did not survive screening because Brown failed to state a claim for relief, and on April 6, 2020, the Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (Doc. 10). Brown was granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint on or before June 5, 2020. (Doc. 10, p. 2). Brown was warned that if he failed to submit a First Amended Complaint, this case would be dismissed with prejudice. (Id., p. 3). The deadline to file a First Amended Complaint has passed. Brown has not filed a First Amended Complaint, nor has he requested an extension. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Brown’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order to file a First Amended Complaint and to prosecute his claim. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan,

128 F.3d 1051

(7th Cir.

1 Plaintiff was released after filing this action. (Doc. 8). 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga,

34 F.3d 466

(7th Cir. 1994); Lucien v. Breweur,

9 F.3d 26, 29

(7th Cir. 1993) (dismissal for failure to prosecute is presumptively with prejudice). Further, because the Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, this dismissal shall count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).

Brown is ADVISED that his obligation to pay the filing fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed, thus the filing fee of $350.00 remains due and payable. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1); Lucien v. Jockisch,

133 F.3d 464, 467

(7th Cir. 1998). If Brown wishes to appeal this Order, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within thirty days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must set forth the issues Brown plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Brown chooses to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. FED.R.APP.P. 3(e);

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2); Ammons v. Gerlinger,

547 F.3d 724, 725-26

(7th Cir. 2008); Sloan v. Lesza,

181 F.3d 857, 858-59

(7th Cir. 1999); Lucien,

133 F.3d at 467

. Moreover, if the appeal is found to be nonmeritorious, Brown

may incur a “strike” under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). A proper and timely motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) may toll the 30-day appeal deadline. FED.R.APP.P. 4(a)(4). A Rule 59(e) motion must be filed no more than twenty-eight (28) days after the entry of the judgment, and this 28-day deadline cannot be extended. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 6, 2020 s/ Staci M. Yandle_____ STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown