District Court, S.D. Illinois, 2020

Paul v. Commissioner of Social Security

Paul v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. Illinois · Decided September 18, 2020
Paul v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LISA G. PAUL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL NO. 20-cv-219-RJD1 ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DALY, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc.

23).

The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See, Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan, 195 F.3d 975, 978 (7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-303 (1993).

The parties agree that, upon receipt of the Court’s order, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision and remand the matter to the ALJ.

On remand, the ALJ will evaluate whether Plaintiff could perform her past relevant work or a significant number of jobs existing in the national economy and during the period under consideration and issue a new decision. The ALJ will also consider whether the medical opinions at issue relate to the period under consideration.

1 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). See, Doc. 11.

Plaintiff applied for disability benefits in November 2016. (Tr. 38). While recognizing that the agency has a full docket, the Court urges the Commissioner to expedite this case on remand.

For good cause shown, the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. 23) is GRANTED.

The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s application for social security benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 18, 2020.

s/Reona J. Daly REONA J. DALY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.