Golliday v. Commissioner of Social Security

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTWYNETTE C. GOLLIDAY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:20 -CV-00682 -MAB ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BEATTY, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan, 195 F.3d 975, 978 (7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of Plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-303 (1993).

1 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). See, Doc. 8.

The parties agree that, upon receipt of the Court’s order, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision and remand the matter to the ALJ for a new hearing and new decision.

The parties agree that, upon remand: The ALJ will evaluate the medical source opinions, including the state- agency psychologists’ opinions on Plaintiff’s concentration and social based limitations, and her abilities to adapt to workplace changes. In addition, the ALJ will evaluate whether Plaintiff could perform her past relevant work or a significant number of jobs existing in the national economy and issue a new decision. (Doc. 17, p. 1).

Plaintiff applied for disability benefits in October 28, 2016 (Tr. 219). While recognizing that the agency has a full docket, the Court urges the Commissioner to expedite this case on remand.

For good cause shown, the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 17) is GRANTED.

The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for social security disability benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 27, 2021 s/ Mark A. Beatty MARK A. BEATTY United States Magistrate Judge