IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MARK LESLIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 20-cv-1071-RJD1 ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DALY, Magistrate Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. 24). The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of

(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan,

(7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer,

(1993). For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. The parties agree that, on remand, the ALJ will evaluate the medical opinions and the RFC finding, take further action to complete the administrative record related to the medical opinions and the RFC finding, and issue a new decision. Plaintiff applied for disability benefits in November 2018.

1 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to

(c). Doc. 12. (Tr. 167). While recognizing that the agency has a full docket, the Court urges the Commissioner to expedite this case on remand. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for social security benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of

(g).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff. All pending motions

are moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 21, 2021.

s/Reona J. Daly REONA J. DALY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE