Braboy v. Wexford Health Sources Inc

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Braboy v. Wexford Health Sources Inc

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DAMIEN BRABOY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 21-CV-1357 ) WEXFORD HEALTH ) SOURCES, INC., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff proceeds pro se from his incarceration in Pontiac Correctional Center. His Complaint is before the Court for a merit review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This section requires the Court to identify cognizable claims stated by the Complaint or dismiss claims that are not cognizable.1 In reviewing the complaint, the Court accepts the factual allegations as true, liberally construing them in Plaintiff's favor and taking Plaintiff’s pro se status into account. Turley v. Rednour,

729 F.3d 645, 649

(7th Cir. 2013). However, conclusory statements and labels are insufficient.

1 A prisoner who has had three prior actions dismissed for failure to state a claim or as frivolous or malicious can no longer proceed in forma pauperis unless the prisoner is under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.”

28  U.S.C. § 1915

(g). Enough facts must be provided to "'state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.'" Alexander v. U.S.,

721 F.3d 418, 422

(7th

Cir. 2013)(quoted cite omitted). Plaintiff alleges that, in January 2020, he began suffering from severe stomach pain and heavy bleeding from his anus when he

tried to have a bowel movement. These difficulties allegedly continued for a year while Defendants ignored him or failed to provide adequate treatment. Then, in January 2021, Plaintiff

received hemorrhoidectomy surgery, but Defendant Dr. Tilden and other Defendants allegedly did not provide adequate post-surgical care, including not following the surgeon's dietary and medication

recommendations. The lack of post-surgical care allegedly caused Plaintiff to suffer further severe pain, bleeding, and difficulty while trying to have a bowel movement.

These allegations state a plausible Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs. The case will proceed for service pursuant to the standard procedures. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1) Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs. This case proceeds solely on the claims identified in

this paragraph. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case, except at the Court’s discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.

2) This case is now in the process of service. Plaintiff is advised to wait until counsel has appeared for Defendants before filing any motions, in order to give Defendants notice and an

opportunity to respond to those motions. Motions filed before Defendants' counsel has filed an appearance will generally be denied as premature. Plaintiff need not submit any evidence to the

Court at this time, unless otherwise directed by the Court. 3) The Court will attempt service on Defendants by mailing each Defendant a waiver of service. Defendants have 60 days from

the date the waiver is sent to file an Answer. If Defendants have not filed Answers or appeared through counsel within 90 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff may file a motion requesting the status of service. After Defendants have been served, the Court will enter

an order setting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. 4) With respect to a Defendant who no longer works at the address provided by Plaintiff, the entity for whom that Defendant

worked while at that address shall provide to the Clerk said Defendant's current work address, or, if not known, said Defendant's forwarding address. This information shall be used

only for effectuating service. Documentation of forwarding addresses shall be retained only by the Clerk and shall not be maintained in the public docket nor disclosed by the Clerk.

5) Defendants shall file an answer within 60 days of the date the waiver is sent by the Clerk. A motion to dismiss is not an answer. The answer should include all defenses appropriate under

the Federal Rules. The answer and subsequent pleadings shall be to the issues and claims stated in this Opinion. In general, an answer sets forth Defendants' positions. The Court does not rule

on the merits of those positions unless and until a motion is filed by Defendants. Therefore, no response to the answer is necessary or will be considered. 6) This District uses electronic filing, which means that,

after Defense counsel has filed an appearance, Defense counsel will automatically receive electronic notice of any motion or other paper filed by Plaintiff with the Clerk. Plaintiff does not need to mail to Defense counsel copies of motions and other papers that Plaintiff

has filed with the Clerk. However, this does not apply to discovery requests and responses. Discovery requests and responses are not filed with the Clerk. Plaintiff must mail his discovery requests and

responses directly to Defendants' counsel. Discovery requests or responses sent to the Clerk will be returned unfiled, unless they are attached to and the subject of a motion to compel. Discovery does

not begin until Defense counsel has filed an appearance and the Court has entered a scheduling order, which will explain the discovery process in more detail.

7) Counsel for Defendants is hereby granted leave to depose Plaintiff at his place of confinement. Counsel for Defendants shall arrange the time for the deposition. 8) Plaintiff shall immediately notify the Court, in writing, of

any change in his mailing address and telephone number. Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court of a change in mailing address or phone number will result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with

prejudice. 9) If a Defendant fails to sign and return a waiver of service to the clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will

take appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S. Marshal's service on that Defendant and will require that Defendant to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 4(d)(2). 10) Within 10 days of receiving from Defendants' counsel an authorization to release medical records, Plaintiff is directed to sign

and return the authorization to Defendants' counsel. 11) The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures.

12) The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

ENTERED: 1/25/2022 s/Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown