UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MICHELLE L.,1 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL NO. 3:25-cv-00515-GCS2 ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

SISON, Magistrate Judge:

Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. 16). The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of

(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corp. Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan,

(7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of plaintiff. See Shalala v. Schaefer,

, 302- 303 (1993). The parties agree that, upon remand, the ALJ will “consider the evidence and issue a new decision.”

1 Plaintiff’s full name will not be used in this Order due to privacy concerns. See FED. R. CIV. PROC. 5.2(c) and the Advisory Committee Notes thereto.

2 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to

(c). See (Doc. 13). For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of

(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 9, 2025. Digitally signed by Judge - Sison AN bat ec. She Date: 2025.06.09 12:32:10 -05’00' GILBERT C. SISON United States Magistrate Judge

Page 2 of 2