UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

MOHAMED NAKHLEH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 24-3142 ) COOLNEY, et al. ) ) Defendants. )

MERIT REVIEW ORDER The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s original complaint with leave to renew pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 for failure to sign the complaint and granted Plaintiff 21 days to file an amended complaint. Text Order entered Jun. 6, 2024. The Court later dismissed this case for Plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint. Text Order entered Oct. 25, 2024. Six days later, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. (Doc. 7). He stated therein that he never received the Court’s 6/6/24 Text Order directing him to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 7) is granted to the extent that he seeks to vacate the Court’s dismissal and file his amended complaint. The Court must “screen” Plaintiff’s amended complaint, and through such process to identify and dismiss any legally insufficient claim, or the entire action if warranted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. A claim is legally insufficient if it “(1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. The Court accepts the factual allegations as true, liberally construing them in the plaintiff's favor. Turley v. Rednour,

(7th Cir. 2013). Conclusory statements and labels are insufficient—the facts alleged must “state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Alexander v. U.S.,

(7th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted). Plaintiff alleges that he told Defendants Coolney, John Doe #1, and John Doe #2 that he feared an attack from his cellmate. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant John Doe #2 called him derogatory names in response, and that Defendant Coolney told him he could refuse housing or

stay in his current cell. Plaintiff alleges that his cellmate attacked him, resulting in a laceration that required 10 staples. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Trusewych and Ashcraft failed to provide aftercare for his wound and ignored his requests for treatment. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Wexford Health Sources and unidentified officials retaliated against him for filing a grievance on the issue. Plaintiff states an Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect against Defendants Coolney, John Doe #1, and John Doe #2, and an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendants Trusewych and Ashcraft. Sinn v. Lemmon,

(7th Cir. 2018); Petties v. Carter,

(7th Cir.

2016) (en banc). Plaintiff does not provide sufficient information regarding the alleged retaliatory acts or the timing of such to state a First Amendment retaliation claim. Daugherty v. Page,

(7th Cir. 2018). No plausible inference arises that Plaintiff’s alleged deprivations resulted from a Defendant Wexford policy, and, therefore, this defendant will be dismissed. Monell v. Dep’t of Social Srvcs. of City of New York,

(1978). Plaintiff cannot prevail against Defendant Greene just because she may have been in charge. Ashcroft v. Iqbal,

(2009). Plaintiff’s Motion to Request Counsel (Doc. 10) Plaintiff has no constitutional or statutory right to counsel in this case. In considering the Plaintiff’s motion, the court asks: (1) has the indigent Plaintiff made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel or been effectively precluded from doing so; and if so, (2) given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it himself? Pruitt v. Mote,

(7th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff has not shown that he made a reasonable effort to obtain counsel on his own. A plaintiff usually does this by attaching copies of letters sent to attorneys seeking representation and copies of any responses received. Because Plaintiff has not satisfied the first prong, the Court does not address the second. Eagan v. Dempsey,

(7th Cir. 2021). Plaintiff’s motion is denied with leave to renew. Plaintiff’s Petitions to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 8, 11) Plaintiff’s petitions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied as moot. The Court granted this relief in its Text Order entered June 5, 2024.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [7] is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to reopen this case and to docket the proposed amended complaint attached to Plaintiff’s motion. 2. The judgment [6] entered October 25, 2024, is VACATED. 3. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court finds that the plaintiff states an Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect against Defendants Coolney, John Doe #1, and John Doe #2, and an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendants Trusewych and Ashcraft. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case, except at the court’s discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 4. This case is now in the process of service. The plaintiff is advised to wait until counsel has appeared for the defendants before filing any motions, in order to give notice to the defendants and an opportunity to respond to those motions. Motions filed before defendants' counsel has filed an appearance will generally be denied as premature. The plaintiff need not submit any evidence to the court at this time, unless otherwise directed by the court. 5. The court will attempt service on the defendants by mailing each defendant a waiver of service. The defendants have 60 days from the date the waiver is sent to file an answer. If the defendants have not filed answers or appeared through counsel within 90 days of the entry of this order, the plaintiff may file a motion requesting the status of service. After the defendants have been served, the court will enter an order setting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. 6. With respect to a defendant who no longer works at the address provided by the plaintiff, the entity for whom that defendant worked while at that address shall provide to the clerk said defendant's current work address, or, if not known, said defendant's forwarding address. This information shall be used only for effectuating service. Documentation of forwarding addresses shall be retained only by the clerk and shall not be maintained in the public docket nor disclosed by the clerk. 7. The defendants shall file an answer within 60 days of the date the waiver is sent by the clerk. A motion to dismiss is not an answer. The answer should include all defenses appropriate under the Federal Rules. The answer and subsequent pleadings shall be to the issues and claims stated in this opinion. In general, an answer sets forth the defendants' positions. The court does not rule on the merits of those positions unless and until a motion is filed by the defendants. Therefore, no response to the answer is necessary or will be considered. 8. This district uses electronic filing, which means that, after defense counsel has filed an appearance, defense counsel will automatically receive electronic notice of any motion or other paper filed by the plaintiff with the clerk. The plaintiff does not need to mail to defense counsel copies of motions and other papers that the plaintiff has filed with the clerk. However, this does not apply to discovery requests and responses. Discovery requests and responses are not filed with the clerk. The plaintiff must mail his discovery requests and responses directly to defendants' counsel. Discovery requests or responses sent to the clerk will be returned unfiled, unless they are attached to and the subject of a motion to compel. Discovery does not begin until defense counsel has filed an appearance and the court has entered a scheduling order, which will explain the discovery process in more detail. 9. Counsel for the defendants is hereby granted leave to depose the plaintiff at his place of confinement. Counsel for the defendants shall arrange the time for the deposition. 10. The plaintiff shall immediately notify the court, in writing, of any change in his mailing address and telephone number. The plaintiff's failure to notify the court of a change in mailing address or phone number will result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice. 11. If a defendant fails to sign and return a waiver of service to the clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the court will take appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S. Marshals service on that defendant and will require that defendant to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2). 12. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. 13. The clerk is directed to terminate Wexford Health Sources and Brittany Greene as defendants. 14. The clerk is directed to attempt service on Coolney, Zorian Trusewych, and Kathy Ashcraft pursuant to the standard procedures. 15. Plaintiff’s Motion to Request Counsel [10] is DENIED with leave to renew. 16. Plaintiff’s Petitions to Proceed in forma pauperis [8][11] are DENIED. Entered this 10th day of September, 2025.

s/Sara Darrow SARA DARROW CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE