Rachel S. v. Commissioner of Social Security

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION RACHEL S., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 25-cv-3235 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas J.

Quivey (d/e 18) recommending that this Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision.

Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on or before June 16, 2026. Neither party filed objections.

The district court reviews de novo any part of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to which a specific written objection has been made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.

Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (also noting that a party who fails to object to the report and recommendation waives appellate review of the factual and legal questions).

After reviewing the record, the Report and Recommendation, the parties’ briefing and memoranda, and the applicable law, the Court finds no clear error in Magistrate Judge Quivey’s Report and Recommendation (d/e 18).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey (d/e 18) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and (2) This case is closed.

ENTERED: June 17, 2026

/s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE