Hickman v. Haines
Hickman v. Haines
10 Ill. 20
Hickman v. Haines
Opinion of the Court
The case of Ripley v. Morris, 2 Gilm. 381, is decisive of the motion. The Court there held that a writ' of error was a new action, and that whenever a non-resident commences an action either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs, the Court is required to dismiss the same.
The case is dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff in error.
Motion allowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.