Illinois Supreme Court, 1852

Rankin v. Ballance

Rankin v. Ballance
Illinois Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1852
13 Ill. 706

Rankin v. Ballance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion must prevail. There is now no judgment to be affirmed or reversed. The various rulings of the Circuit Court have in effect been set aside. The cause is now pending for trial de novo in that court. If the judgment had been affirmed on the appeal, the plaintiff in error might still prosecute his writ of error, and have his exceptions considered. But the exceptions fell with the judgment. The writ of error will be dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.