Hunt v. Tinkham
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- People Ex Rel. Romani v. Meyering (Ill. 1933)
- Roll v. Springfield Consolidated Railway Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1922)
- Warner v. Kelley (Ill. App. Ct. 1880)
- Hall v. Mills (Ill. App. Ct. 1879)
- Utley v. Burns (Ill. 1873)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The court properly overruled the motion to change the venue. No notice of the motion was given, and the statute positively requires a notice. It is a misapprehension to say that here no notice could have been given. It is certain that at least one day’s notice, could have been given, for the affidavit is made the day before the motion, and there is no excuse shown why notice was not given as the statute required.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.