Hunt v. Tinkham

Illinois Supreme Court
Hunt v. Tinkham, 21 Ill. 639 (Ill. 1859)
Caton

Hunt v. Tinkham

Opinion of the Court

Caton, C. J.

The court properly overruled the motion to change the venue. No notice of the motion was given, and the statute positively requires a notice. It is a misapprehension to say that here no notice could have been given. It is certain that at least one day’s notice, could have been given, for the affidavit is made the day before the motion, and there is no excuse shown why notice was not given as the statute required.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bela T. Hunt, impleaded with O. H. Giles v. Edward I. Tinkham
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published