Matson v. Connelly
Matson v. Connelly
24 Ill. 142
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fread v. Hoag (Ill. App. Ct. 1907)
- West Chicago St. R. R. v. Horne (Ill. App. Ct. 1902)
- Daft v. Drew (Ill. App. Ct. 1891)
- Kane v. People (Ill. App. Ct. 1883)
- Goodrich v. City of Omaha (Neb. 1881)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There was no necessity for amending this verdict in the court below. The defect is cured by our statute of amendments and jeofails.
Error having been joined, the motion to dismiss the appeal comes too late. It would have prevailed if made in the first instance, as the judgment does not amount to twenty dollars, exclusive of costs, nor does it relate to a franchise or freehold.
The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.