Roberts v. Fahs

Illinois Supreme Court
Roberts v. Fahs, 32 Ill. 474 (Ill. 1863)

Roberts v. Fahs

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The statute is imperative, that if a non-resident plaintiff shall institute his suit without first having given a bond for costs, “ the court, on motion, shall dismiss the same.” Scates’ Comp. 244. A writ of error is considered as a new action, and the statute applies to all suits instituted in the Circuit or Supreme Court by non-resident plaintiffs. Ripley v. Morris, 2 Gilm. 382; Hickman, v. Haines, 5 id. 20.

The motion is in apt time. It is made before the time has passed for pleading in abatement, which is sufficient. Trustees v. Walters, 12 Ill. 154; Randolph v Emerick, 13 Ill. 346.

The rule will he entered. Rule nisi.

Afterwards, the plaintiff having failed to show cause against it, the rule was made absolute.

Reference

Full Case Name
Roberts, Trustees, &c. v. Fahs
Cited By
8 cases
Status
Published