Roberts v. Fahs
Illinois Supreme Court
Roberts v. Fahs, 32 Ill. 474 (Ill. 1863)
Roberts v. Fahs
Opinion of the Court
The statute is imperative, that if a non-resident plaintiff shall institute his suit without first having given a bond for costs, “ the court, on motion, shall dismiss the same.” Scates’ Comp. 244. A writ of error is considered as a new action, and the statute applies to all suits instituted in the Circuit or Supreme Court by non-resident plaintiffs. Ripley v. Morris, 2 Gilm. 382; Hickman, v. Haines, 5 id. 20.
The motion is in apt time. It is made before the time has passed for pleading in abatement, which is sufficient. Trustees v. Walters, 12 Ill. 154; Randolph v Emerick, 13 Ill. 346.
The rule will he entered. Rule nisi.
Afterwards, the plaintiff having failed to show cause against it, the rule was made absolute.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Roberts, Trustees, &c. v. Fahs
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published