Mills v. Heeney

Illinois Supreme Court
Mills v. Heeney, 35 Ill. 173 (Ill. 1864)
Beckwith

Mills v. Heeney

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Beckwith

delivered the opinion of the Court:

An established rule of practice in this State requires decrees in chancery, directing the sale of real estate for the non-payment of money, to give at least ninety days for its payment where there is no right of redemption from the sale. 24 Ill. 551; 27 id. 497; ib. 23; 28 id. 457.

A decree in a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien should not be rendered for a larger sum than is claimed by the petition, and interest from the time it was filed, where it asserts no claim for interest. 29 Ill. 500; 17 How. 17. In other respects the decree of the court below was correct. It will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Decree reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
John B. Mills v. Bernard Heeney
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
1. Decree for sale of real estate — time for payment of money. Decrees in chancery directing the sale of real estate for the non-payment of money, should give at least ninety days for its payment, where there is no right of redemption from the sale. 2. Rule applied to decree to enforce a mechanic’s lien. 3. Decree — Mechanic’s lien—recovery limited to amount sued for. A decree in a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien should not be rendered for a larger sum than is claimed by the petition, and interest from the time it was filed, when it asserts no claim for interest.