Adams v. Robertson
Adams v. Robertson
40 Ill. 40
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Thomas v. John O'Brien Lumber Co. (Ill. 1900)
- Furthman v. McNulta (Ill. 1899)
- O'Kane v. West End Dry Goods Store (Ill. App. Ct. 1898)
- Jackson v. Haisly (Fla. 1891)
- Ross v. Plano Steel Works (Ill. App. Ct. 1889)
- Patterson v. Stewart (Ill. 1882)
- Illinois Western Railroad v. Gay (Ill. App. Ct. 1880)
- Hatch v. Wegg (Ill. App. Ct. 1880)
- Graff v. Reed (Ill. App. Ct. 1880)
- Day v. City of Clinton (Ill. App. Ct. 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
A correct construction of the forty-eighth section of the practice act (Rev. Stat. 1845, 420) would require that a party must make application for further time to file the transcript, within the three days, within which the record should be filed. Such application not having been made in this case, within the proper time, we cannot give leave to file the record now. Roger v. Tilford, Breese (Beecher’s), 407.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.