Dietrich v. Rumsey

Illinois Supreme Court
Dietrich v. Rumsey, 40 Ill. 50 (Ill. 1867)

Dietrich v. Rumsey

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The record shows a judgment rendered on the 13th day of the month, while the condition of the appeal bond recites a judgment’ rendered on the 14th day of the same month. This misdescription of the judgment appealed from is fatal. A rule nisi will be entered, requiring the appellant to file a sufficient appeal bond, or, in default thereof, the appeal will be dismissed.

The bond does not recite that there was a judgment of retorno in the court below; it had better be amended also in that regard.

Mule nisi.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published