Gage v. Eich
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Klever Shampay Karpet Kleaners, Inc. v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 1925)
- Kuehn v. Kuehn (Tex. App. 1921)
- Routt v. Newman (Ill. App. Ct. 1910)
- DeGrasse v. H. W. Gossard Co. (Ill. 1908)
- Glos v. Clark (Ill. 1902)
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago (Ill. 1893)
- C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. Lewis (Ill. App. Ct. 1893)
- Stanton v. Kinsey (Ill. App. Ct. 1892)
- Conant v. Riseborough (Ill. App. Ct. 1889)
- Hunter v. Hunter (Ill. 1881)
- People v. Neal (Ill. App. Ct. 1878)
- Racine & Mississippi Railroad v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (Ill. 1873)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court:
It is a well settled rule in equity practice, as well as in proceedings at common law, that no appeal lies from any interlocutory order merely, in either court. There must be a final decree, order or judgment, to justify an appeal.
In this case, there has been no final decree; nothing, indeed, but overruling a demurrer to the bill and a reference to the master to state an account and to report the same to the court. The case is yet in, fieri, and no appeal can lie. 2 Dan. Ch. Pr. 1543, and the case cited in note 1.
For these reasons the appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.