There was no ground of objection to the depositions. Notice was given to appellant’s attorney of the time of suing out the dedimus, with interrogatories, in full compliance with section 10 of chapter 40, R. Stat. 233, and they were returned to the superior court enclosed with the dedimus.

The proof of indebtedness is overwhelming in favor of appellee, and the verdict was right, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affii'med.