Edwards v. Evans
Edwards v. Evans
Opinion of the Court
From the record in this case, there has never been a trial upon the merits, and we are now asked to affirm the judgment on account of the decision between the same parties in Evans v. Edwards, 26 Ill. 279.
The suit was commenced in November, 1857. In December following, a demurrer .was filed to the declaration, alleging, as cause of demurrer, a want of consideration in the bond sued on. This was sustained and judgment rendered against plaintiff for costs.
The suit was then brought to this court, and reversed with, directions.
In December, 1861, a judgment was again obtained in the court, below, and was reversed by this court in April, 1862. This reversal abrogated the decision reported in-26 Ill. supra.
The supposed judgment, at the June term, 1862, of the court below, was no judgment. It was never entered upon the record. There was only a verdict and an order of the judge upon his docket. Upon the motion and affidavit of the defendant, at the September term, 1862, the verdict should have been set aside, and the defendant should have been permitted to plead and defend the suit.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Alonzo Edwards v. Benjamin F. Evans
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Judgment—;judge's entry is not. An order of the judge on his docket for judgment on the Verdict of a juiy, not entered upon the record, is not a judgment. 2. Reversal—special directions. Where the judgment of the court below upon demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration was reversed, with special direction to the court to render judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon the demurrer and take an inquest of damages, and where the second judgment entered under the remanding order was reversed at the suit of th^ defendant below, it was held, that the subsequent reversal abrogated the direction given in the first order of reversal, and that the defendant was entitled, on a showing, to plead to the merits.