Harris v. Whitmore
Illinois Supreme Court
Harris v. Whitmore, 66 Ill. 144 (Ill. 1872)
Harris v. Whitmore
Opinion of the Court
In this ease the declaration counted upon the note, as well- as the award which the arbitrators had made for its payment. Admitting the award was void for uncertainty, as claimed by counsel for defendant, we see no reason why the note should not have been admitted in evidence, and no reason is suggested by counsel for defendant. The judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William Harris v. William F. Whitmore
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Pleading and evidence—award—promissory note. Where the plain, tiff declared upon an award for the payment of a promissory note, and. also upon the note itself: Held, that if the award was void for uncertainty, the note was properly admissible in evidence.