Reed v. Horne
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Coal Creek Drainage & Levee District v. Sanitary District (Ill. App. Ct. 1928)
- Beckers v. City of Kankakee (Ill. App. Ct. 1919)
- Harmon v. Callahan (Ill. App. Ct. 1917)
- Witteman Co. v. Goeke (Ill. App. Ct. 1916)
- Mann v. Brown (Ill. 1914)
- Whitney v. Fred D. Jone Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1912)
- Estate of Nester v. Carney Bros. (Ill. App. Ct. 1901)
- Reynolds v. Mandel (Ill. 1898)
- Gaynor v. Hibernian Savings Bank (Ill. App. Ct. 1897)
- Saunders v. Bernard (Ill. App. Ct. 1882)
- Van Cott v. Sprague (Ill. App. Ct. 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The errors assigned are, the Superior Court erred in striking the plea from the files for want of an affidavit of merits, and in reference to and assessing damages by the court. It is suggested in argument, the plea was stricken out of the record upon the supposition the act concerning the practice of the courts of Cook county, of February 12, 1853, which required the defendant in all civil actions to file with his plea an affidavit of merits, wa.s still in force. The record contains no bill of exceptions, and we can not know the ground of the decision by the court.
It is fatal to the objection taken, that neither the motion nor any exception to the decision of the court striking out the plea is preserved by a bill of exceptions, as required by the rules of practice in this court. Such motions do not become a part of the record unless made so by means of a bill of exceptions. The rule on this subject was declared in Snell v. M. E. Church, 58 Ill. 290, and that case is conclusive of the same question in the case at bar.
¡Neither party asked to have the damages assessed by a jury, and in such cases the statute expressly authorizes the court to make the assessment. Gross’ Statutes, p. 512, sec. 23.
¡No error appearing, the judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.