Day v. People
Illinois Supreme Court
Day v. People, 76 Ill. 380 (Ill. 1875)
Day v. People
Opinion of the Court
This was an indictment containing twenty counts. The verdict was: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty on ten counts,” on which the court rendered consecutive judgments. This was error. The verdict should have specified the counts on which they found the defendant guilty. The People ex rel. v. Whitson, 74 Ill. -. It was impossible to know, from the verdict, on which counts the jury found defendant guilty, and on which he was acquitted. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jacob Day v. The People of the State of Illinois
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Vebdict—in criminal case—must specify counts on which defendant is found guilty. Where a defendant in a criminal case is found guilty of less than the whole number of the counts in the indictment, without specifying which counts, it will be error to render judgment on the verdict. The verdict in such case should specify the counts upon which the defendant is found guilty.