Lehmer v. People ex rel. Miller
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Doherty v. City of Detroit (Mich. 1928)
- People ex rel. Kochersperger v. Sass (Ill. 1898)
- In re Stutsman County (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota 1898)
- Doremus v. People ex rel. Kochersperger (Ill. 1896)
- Scotten v. City of Detroit (Mich. 1895)
- Riebling v. People ex rel. Columbia Levee & Drainage District (Ill. 1893)
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. People ex rel. Seip (Ill. 1887)
- Gage v. Parker (Ill. 1882)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Cook county, rendered for a special assessment levied and assessed upon certain lands and lots in the town of Lake, for the improvement of Parker’s avenue, so called, and reported by the collector to be delinquent.
Several objections were made on the application for judgment, none of which do we deem valid.
As to all matters preceding the application for judgment, they must, under the authority of The People v. Brislin, ante, p. 423, be considered res adjudicata, and not now to be again investigated.
As to the point made on the judgment, that the law authorizes but one judgment for taxes and special assessments, we fail to see in these proceedings any substantial departure from the provisions of the General ¡Revenue Law, not provided' for by the “ Act in relation to the collection of taxes and special assessments,” in force May 2, 1873. Sess. Laws 1873, p. 69. See, also, The People, etc. v. Brislin, supra.
There is nothing in the point as to amendments of the assessment rolls. These were clearly clerical errors and omissions not affecting appellant’s rights or interests in any manner.
It is too late now to inquire into the nature of Parker’s avenue—whether public or private. That objection should have been made when application for confirmation of the assessment was made, of which appellant had notice by publication. It is now res adjudieata. It must have been adjudged a public street when the order of confirmation was entered, and there is no appeal from that.
We fail to perceive any error in the judgment, and it must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.