Camp v. Bryan
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Garst v. Jackson (Ill. App. Ct. 1918)
- Stirlen v. Neustadt (Ill. App. Ct. 1893)
- Dunn v. Wilkinson (Ill. App. Ct. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The damages allowed on the dissolution of the injunction enjoining the collection of a judgment, are limited by statute to ten per cent upon the amount. Rev. Stat. 1874, p. 579. The damages allowed in this case are $50. The amount of the judgment enjoined was less than $184. For this error the decree must he reversed. It is by no means clear upon this record, that the injunction should not have been made perpetual. The bill charges a fraudulent conspiracy to use, to the detriment of appellant, a paper-called an indemnity, whicli, it seems from the record, was never executed and delivered by appellant; of all which, the bill says, the alleged conspirators had notice. If this be true, appellant has a right, in equity, to have that document, and the judgment upon it, adjudged null and.void.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.