Ashley Wire Co. v. Illinois Steel Co.
Cases that cite this one
27 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Joanna-Western Mills Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
- Motter v. Patterson (10th Cir. 1933)
- National Trust Bank v. Seaman (Ill. App. Ct. 1933)
- Whipple v. Christie (Minn. 1913)
- Regents of the New Mexico College of Agriculture & Mechanic Arts v. Academy of Aviation, Inc. (N.M. 1971)
- Roth v. Ahrensfeld (Ill. 1940)
- Schmitt v. De Laney (7th Cir. 1938)
- In re Robin Bros. Bakeries, Inc. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1937)
- Noremac, Inc. v. Centre Hill Court, Inc. (Va. 1935)
- W.E. Richmond Co. v. Security Nat. Bk. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1933)
- In re Chelsea Exchange Corp. (Court of Chancery of Delaware 1932)
- EE Gray Corporation v. Meehan (1st Cir. 1931)
- Clark Realty Co. v. Douglas (Nev. 1923)
- Grant County State Bank v. Northwestern Land Co. (N.D. 1914)
- Talmage v. Union Central Life Insurance (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Cohen (Ill. App. Ct. 1936)
- Scott v. Scott (Ill. 1923)
- New York Central Railroad v. Lehigh Stone Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1921)
- Haj v. American Bottle Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1913)
- Federal Life Insurance v. Griffin (Ill. App. Ct. 1912)
- Magerstadt v. First National Bank (Ill. App. Ct. 1912)
- People ex rel. Coffman v. Ryan (Ill. 1907)
- Clark v. People (Ill. 1906)
- W. B. Conkey Co. v. Goldman (Ill. App. Ct. 1905)
- National Masonic Accident Ass'n v. Burr (Neb. 1899)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court:
We not only have had the benefit of an oral argument, but have also carefully read and examined as well the briefs and arguments filed in the Appellate Court as the elaborate additional briefs and arguments submitted in this court. We concur in the judgment of the Appellate Court and in the reasons given for its decision. There is nothing in the case that requires any further expression of opinion on our part. Additional grounds that would go in affirmance of the judgment might be stated, but we deem it unnecessary to add to what has already been said.
The judgment is affirmed.
Judgmmt aMrmed.
Mr. Justice Cartwright took no part in this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.