Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Illinois /Cases /Illinois Supreme Court /

1904

452 Illinois Supreme Court opinions from 1904.

  • Craw v. Craw Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 246; 71 N.E. 450
  • Cronkhite v. Strain Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 331; 71 N.E. 392
  • Cuneo v. O'Connor Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 284
  • Cunningham v. State Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 410; 71 N.E. 389; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3080
  • Duggan v. Ryan Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 133; 71 N.E. 848
  • East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co. v. Altgen Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 213; 71 N.E. 377; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3056
  • Fitchburg Steam Engine Co. v. Potter Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 138; 71 N.E. 933; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3272
  • Folsom v. Board of Trustees Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 404; 71 N.E. 384
  • Fortune v. Gilbert Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 354; 71 N.E. 442
  • Franey v. People Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 206; 71 N.E. 443; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3054
  • Gage v. City of Chicago Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 109; 71 N.E. 877
  • Glos v. Mickow Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 117; 71 N.E. 830
  • Glos v. Mulcahy Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 639; 71 N.E. 629
  • Hauser v. People Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 253; 71 N.E. 416; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3061
  • Hofmann v. Burris Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 587; 71 N.E. 584
  • Illinois Central Railroad v. Keegan Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 150; 71 N.E. 321
  • Illinois Central Railroad v. Prickett Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 140; 71 N.E. 435
  • Illinois Southern Railway Co. v. Marshall Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 562; 66 L.R.A. 297
  • Illinois, Iowa & Minnesota Railway Co. v. Freeman Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 270; 71 N.E. 444; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3062
  • In re Estate of Maher Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 160; 71 N.E. 438
  • Kehl v. Abram Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 218; 71 N.E. 347
  • Koebel v. Chicago Landlords' Protective Bureau Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 176; 71 N.E. 362
  • Leigh v. Laughlin Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 192; 71 N.E. 881
  • Lingle v. City of Chicago Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 600; 71 N.E. 590
  • Lloyd v. Catlin Coal Co. Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 460; 71 N.E. 335
  • Lowery v. City of Pekin Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 575; 71 N.E. 626
  • Lusk v. City of Chicago Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 183; 71 N.E. 878
  • Lyman v. City of Chicago Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 209
  • Mackey v. Northern Milling Co. Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 115; 71 N.E. 448
  • Martin v. Todd Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 105; 71 N.E. 852
  • Mason v. Odum Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 471; 71 N.E. 386
  • Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Bradley Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 128; 71 N.E. 343
  • Murr v. City of Naperville Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 371; 71 N.E. 380
  • Osgood v. Skinner Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 229; 71 N.E. 869
  • People ex rel. Fisher v. Carter Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 122; 71 N.E. 369
  • People ex rel. Kisselberg v. City of Chicago Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 479; 71 N.E. 400; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3089
  • People ex rel. Leach v. County of Vermilion Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 209; 71 N.E. 368; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3055
  • People ex rel. Partello v. McCullough Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 488; 71 N.E. 602
  • People ex rel. Postel v. Rose Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 582; 71 N.E. 580
  • People v. Griesbach Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 35; 71 N.E. 874
  • Quigg v. People Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 17; 71 N.E. 886; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3257
  • Ray v. Henderson Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 305; 71 N.E. 579
  • Roby v. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co. Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 173; 71 N.E. 822
  • Rock Island Sash & Door Works v. Pohlman Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 133; 71 N.E. 428
  • Rogers v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. Jun 23, 1904 211 Ill. 126
  • Schulte v. Schleeper Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 357; 71 N.E. 325
  • Schultz v. People Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 196; 71 N.E. 405; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3053
  • Scott v. People Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 594; 71 N.E. 582; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3100
  • Sherman v. People Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 552; 71 N.E. 618; 1904 Ill. LEXIS 3095
  • Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting Jun 23, 1904 210 Ill. 342; 71 N.E. 371
« Prev 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑