Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Illinois /Cases /Illinois Supreme Court /

1919

405 Illinois Supreme Court opinions from 1919.

  • Liberty Foundries Co. v. Industrial Commission 124 N.E. 559, (Ill. 1919)
  • City of Chicago v. Lost 124 N.E. 580, (Ill. 1919)
  • McGinnis v. McGinnis 124 N.E. 562, (Ill. 1919)
  • Moore v. Downing 124 N.E. 557, (Ill. 1919)
  • Garden City Sand Co. v. Christley 124 N.E. 729, (Ill. 1919)
  • Oliver v. Ross 124 N.E. 800, (Ill. 1919)
  • Knight v. Seney 124 N.E. 813, (Ill. 1919)
  • Cottingham v. National Mutual Church Insurance 124 N.E. 822, (Ill. 1919)
  • People ex rel. School Directors v. Oakwood 124 N.E. 829, (Ill. 1919)
  • Fisher v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 124 N.E. 831, (Ill. 1919)
  • People ex rel. Peterson v. Omen 124 N.E. 860, (Ill. 1919)
  • Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. State Bank 124 N.E. 844, (Ill. 1919)
  • Hartray v. Chicago Railways Co. 124 N.E. 849, (Ill. 1919)
  • Stephens Engineering Co. v. Industrial Commission 124 N.E. 869, (Ill. 1919)
  • Limbach v. Limbach 124 N.E. 859, (Ill. 1919)
  • Jones v. Schmidt 124 N.E. 835, (Ill. 1919)
  • Matthews v. Andrews 124 N.E. 871, (Ill. 1919)
  • Congregational Sunday School & Publishing Society v. Board of Review 125 N.E. 7, (Ill. 1919)
  • Hayes Branch Drainage District v. Illinois Central Railroad 124 N.E. 819, (Ill. 1919)
  • Rooks Creek Evangelical Lutheran Church v. First Lutheran Church 124 N.E. 793, (Ill. 1919)
  • City of Chicago v. Mayer 124 N.E. 842, (Ill. 1919)
  • Hoefeld v. Ozello 125 N.E. 5, (Ill. 1919)
  • Bowman & Bull Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. 124 N.E. 851, (Ill. 1919)
  • Peoria Railway Co. v. Industrial Commission 125 N.E. 1, (Ill. 1919)
  • Theiner v. Speckin 124 N.E. 826, (Ill. 1919)
  • People v. Doras 125 N.E. 2, (Ill. 1919)
  • Bishop v. Chicago Railways Co. 124 N.E. 837, (Ill. 1919)
  • Shaw v. Dorris 124 N.E. 796, (Ill. 1919)
  • O'Callaghan v. Industrial Commission 124 N.E. 811, (Ill. 1919)
  • Ware v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. 290 Ill. 227, (Ill. 1919)
  • People v. Lalor 124 N.E. 866, (Ill. 1919)
  • People ex rel. Black v. Smith 124 N.E. 807, (Ill. 1919)
  • William E. Dee Co. v. Proviso Coal Co. 290 Ill. 252, (Ill. 1919)
  • Hacken v. Isenberg 124 N.E. 306, (Ill. 1919)
  • People ex rel. Vance v. Bushu 123 N.E. 517, (Ill. 1919)
  • People v. Moses 123 N.E. 634, (Ill. 1919)
  • American Can Co. v. Emmerson 123 N.E. 581, (Ill. 1919)
  • People ex rel. Thrasher v. Eisenberg 123 N.E. 532, (Ill. 1919)
  • People v. Paisley 123 N.E. 573, (Ill. 1919)
  • Mitchell v. Lowden 123 N.E. 566, (Ill. 1919)
  • Heinze v. Industrial Commission 123 N.E. 598, (Ill. 1919)
  • Moll v. Industrial Commission 123 N.E. 562, (Ill. 1919)
  • Eichhorn v. St. Louis & O'Fallon Coal Co. 123 N.E. 603, (Ill. 1919)
  • Novak v. Kruse 123 N.E. 519, (Ill. 1919)
  • People v. Foster 123 N.E. 534, (Ill. 1919)
  • Wilson v. Harrold 123 N.E. 563, (Ill. 1919)
  • Otis Elevator Co. v. Industrial Commission 123 N.E. 600, (Ill. 1919)
  • Ogren v. Rockford Star Printing Co. 123 N.E. 587, (Ill. 1919)
  • Kane v. Weis 123 N.E. 518, (Ill. 1919)
  • Spiegel's House Furnishing Co. v. Industrial Commission 123 N.E. 606, (Ill. 1919)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 9 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑