Illinois Supreme Court, 1951

Goldblatt Bros., Inc. v. Sixty-Third and Halsted Realty Co.

Illinois Supreme Court · Decided December 18, 1951 · Per Curiam

102 N.E.2d 749; 410 Ill. 468; 1951 Ill. LEXIS 457 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N. Novicky, George F. Tsuetaki v. Nick N. Novicky (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N. Novicky, George F. Tsuetaki v. Nick N. Novicky (Fed. Cir. 1984)
Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District (7th Cir. 1977)
N In Comm Trans Dist v. Chicago S Shore/S Bend RR (Ind. 1998)
Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend Railroad (Ind. 1997)
Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of Peoria (7th Cir. 1977)
Batiste v. Furnco Construction Corporation (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Petitions for leave to appeal have been allowed in Goldblatt Bros., Inc., v. Sixty-third and Halsted Realty Co., No. 31968, and Sixty-third and Halsted Realty Co. v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc., No. 31969. For purposes of a hearing and opinion the cases are consolidated.

The parties in these cases have filed written stipulations agreeing to the disposition of the cases. The stipulation in each case is as follows: •

“It is stipulated by and between the parties hereto by their respective attorneys of record that the judgment of the Appellate Court shall be affirmed.

“It is further stipulated by all parties hereto that any words or phrases or conclusions in the opinion of the Appellate Court which in any manner reflect upon the good faith or gbod motives of appellant, Goldblatt Bros., Inc., shall be considered as excepted to by Goldblatt Bros., Inc.”

The court having considered the records submitted and the stipulations of the parties, it is ordered that the judgments be affirmed. The phrases and conclusions in the opinion of the Appellate Court which in any manner reflect upon the good faith and good motives of appellant, Goldblatt Bros., Inc., are, in our opinion, unsubstantiated in the record.

Judgments affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.