1891
271 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1891.
- Campbell v. State 29 N.E. 418, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Duffy v. Carman 29 N.E. 454, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Brown v. Sullivan 29 N.E. 453, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Cooper v. Ellis 29 N.E. 444, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Brown v. Loesch 29 N.E. 450, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. Park 29 N.E. 444, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Wabash Railroad v. Williamson 29 N.E. 455, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Roberts v. Kendall 29 N.E. 487, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- O'Kane v. Miller 29 N.E. 439, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Fenstemaker 29 N.E. 440, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- State ex rel. Miller v. Day 29 N.E. 436, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Repp v. Wiles 29 N.E. 441, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Lewis v. Fillion 29 N.E. 443, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Atkinson v. Saltsman 29 N.E. 435, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Sinclair v. Hanna 29 N.E. 434, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Phenix Insurance v. Pickel 29 N.E. 432, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Board of Commissioners v. Brod 29 N.E. 430, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Pennsylvania Co. v. Davis 29 N.E. 425, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Willitts v. Schuyler 29 N.E. 273, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- State v. Jones 29 N.E. 274, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Ostler v. State 29 N.E. 270, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Petree v. Fielder 29 N.E. 271, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Kreite v. Smith 29 N.E. 174, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Grave v. Pemberton 29 N.E. 177, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Watson v. Deeds 29 N.E. 151, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Evansville & Indianapolis Railroad v. Frank 29 N.E. 419, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Brow v. Levy 29 N.E. 417, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Conduitt v. Ryan 29 N.E. 160, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- State ex rel. Catalano v. Martin 29 N.E. 164, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Graham 29 N.E. 170, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- City of Fort Wayne v. Patterson 29 N.E. 167, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Carter v. Lacy 29 N.E. 168, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Green v. Beckner 29 N.E. 172, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Boltz v. Smith 29 N.E. 155, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Warner v. State ex rel. Haywood 29 N.E. 173, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Hawkins v. Thomas 29 N.E. 157, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Barnett v. Gluting 29 N.E. 154, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Benson v. Christian 30 N.E. 625, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Cole v. Board of Commissioners 28 N.E. 1031, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Smith v. McDonald 28 N.E. 994, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Hood v. Tyner 28 N.E. 1033, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Brand v. State ex rel. Haywood 28 N.E. 1030, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Moyer v. Bucks 28 N.E. 992, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Milligan 28 N.E. 1019, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Levi v. Kraminer 28 N.E. 1028, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Town of Monticello v. Fox 28 N.E. 1025, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Everman v. Hyman 28 N.E. 1022, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Beers v. Flock 28 N.E. 1011, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Sosat v. State 28 N.E. 1017, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)
- Westbrook v. Aultman, Miller & Co. 28 N.E. 1011, (Ind. Ct. App. 1891)