1892
284 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1892.
- Block v. Haseltine 29 N.E. 937, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Williams v. State ex rel. Moon 29 N.E. 1079, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Hunt v. State 29 N.E. 933, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Kittenger v. Monroe School Township 29 N.E. 931, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Powell v. Bennett 29 N.E. 926, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Noble School Furniture Co. v. Washington School Township 29 N.E. 935, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Chappell v. Missionary Society of Churches of Christ 29 N.E. 924, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Devenbaugh v. Nifer 29 N.E. 923, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Byers v. Davis 29 N.E. 798, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Blanchard v. State 29 N.E. 783, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Cochran v. Ward 29 N.E. 795, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Lane v. Union National Bank of Massillon 29 N.E. 613, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- State v. Coffing 29 N.E. 615, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Cresswell v. White 29 N.E. 612, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Bowser v. Cox 29 N.E. 616, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Sluyter v. Union Central Life Insurance 29 N.E. 608, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Goodbub v. Scheller 29 N.E. 610, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- City of New Albany v. Ray 29 N.E. 611, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Nichols v. Pressler 29 N.E. 611, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Hankey v. Downey 29 N.E. 606, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Lockwood v. Woods 29 N.E. 569, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Sheeks v. Fillion 29 N.E. 786, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Rose 29 N.E. 616, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Wells v. Bradley, Holton & Co. 29 N.E. 572, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Jaqua v. Woodbury 29 N.E. 573, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Busjahn v. McLean 29 N.E. 494, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Swift v. State ex rel. Develin 29 N.E. 488, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Baldwin v. Shill 29 N.E. 619, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- McFadden v. Schroeder 29 N.E. 491, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Adams v. Main 29 N.E. 792, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Loy v. Petty 29 N.E. 788, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Owens v. Tague 29 N.E. 784, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Fenn 29 N.E. 790, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)
- Dygert v. Dygert 29 N.E. 490, (Ind. Ct. App. 1892)