Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Court of Appeals /

1894

323 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1894.

  • Wilson v. Western Fruit Co. 2 Ind. App. 89, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Moffitt v. Phenix Insurance 2 Ind. App. 233, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. Ott 2 Ind. App. 564, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Elwood Planing Mill Co. v. Jackson 2 Ind. App. 181, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Sears 2 Ind. App. 654, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Cooper v. Wabash Railroad 2 Ind. App. 211, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Dean v. Brock 2 Ind. App. 507, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Snodgrass v. Meeks 38 N.E. 833, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Muncie Pulp Co. v. Jones 2 Ind. App. 110, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • McFarland v. Swihart 2 Ind. App. 175, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Haymond v. Bledsoe 2 Ind. App. 202, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • State ex rel. Slinkard v. Edwards 2 Ind. App. 226, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Capron v. State 2 Ind. App. 95, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Van Allen v. Smith 2 Ind. App. 103, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Zumbaugh 2 Ind. App. 107, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Tague v. Owens 2 Ind. App. 200, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Swarts v. Cohen 2 Ind. App. 20, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Salem Bedford Stone Co. v. Hobbs 2 Ind. App. 27, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Ault 38 N.E. 492, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Morrison Plummer & Co. v. Schlesinger 38 N.E. 493, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Earnest v. Shoemaker 38 N.E. 543, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. Walsh 2 Ind. App. 13, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Aultman & Co. v. Richardson 38 N.E. 532, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Crist v. Jacoby 38 N.E. 543, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Ward v. Christy 38 N.E. 533, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Continental Insurance v. Chew 2 Ind. App. 330, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Talbott v. Barber 2 Ind. App. 1, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Allen v. Town of Salem 38 N.E. 425, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Brant v. Barnett 38 N.E. 421, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Lange 41 N.E. 609, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Chicago and Erie Railroad Co. v. Barnes 38 N.E. 428, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Forester v. Forester 38 N.E. 426, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Newton v. Pence 38 N.E. 484, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Isom 38 N.E. 423, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Board of Commissioners v. Sappenfield 38 N.E. 358, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Swope v. Bier 38 N.E. 340, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Current v. Fulton 38 N.E. 419, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Chapple v. Davis 38 N.E. 355, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. King 38 N.E. 352, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Breedlove 38 N.E. 357, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. Wilson 2 Ind. App. 488, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Wade v. Huber 38 N.E. 351, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Evans v. Koons 38 N.E. 350, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Rader 38 N.E. 341, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Hanna v. Dunham 38 N.E. 343, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Luddington 38 N.E. 342, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Robinson v. Teeter 38 N.E. 222, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Darnall v. Simpkins 38 N.E. 219, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • Hankey v. Downey 38 N.E. 220, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
  • City of Peru v. Brown 38 N.E. 223, (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 … 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑