Indiana Court of Appeals, 1896

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of Noblesville

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of Noblesville
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided September 24, 1896 · Gavin
16 Ind. App. 20; 44 N.E. 652; 1896 Ind. App. LEXIS 324

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of Noblesville

Opinion of the Court

Gavin, J.

In a suit to recover the penalty for a violation of a city ordinance, so much of the ordinance as relates to the offense must be referred to in *21the complaint by number of the section or sections and date of adoption. Green v. City of Indianapolis, 25 Ind. 490; Clevenger v. Town of Rushville, 90 Ind. 258; Burns’ R. S. 1894, section 3501.

Where, however, one section of an ordinahce defines the offense and fixes the penalty, while the following section merely provides for the mode of publication, it is necessary to designate in the complaint only the former section and not the latter.

In such an action the city is not required to aver or prove publication of the ordinance, unless this fact be denied by affidavit. Lake Erie, etc., R. R. Co. v. City of Noblesville, 15 Ind. App. 697; Green v. City of Indianapolis, supra; Burns’ R. S. 1894, section 3499.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.