1898
265 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1898.
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Spaulding 52 N.E. 410, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Sloan v. Sloan 52 N.E. 413, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- O'Hara v. State 52 N.E. 414, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Jenkins v. Craig 52 N.E. 423, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- State v. Johnson 52 N.E. 422, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Hamilton v. State 52 N.E. 419, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Oldfather v. Zent 52 N.E. 236, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- City of Huntington v. Burke 52 N.E. 415, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Indiana Natural & Illuminating Gas Co. v. Marshall 52 N.E. 232, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Rogers v. City of Bloomington 52 N.E. 242, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Sponhaur v. Malloy 52 N.E. 245, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Douglas v. State 52 N.E. 238, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Cromer v. State 52 N.E. 239, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Whisnand v. Fee 52 N.E. 229, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Patton v. Matter 52 N.E. 173, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Thomas v. Felt 52 N.E. 171, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Case v. Nelson 52 N.E. 176, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Tennell 52 N.E. 168, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Aultman & Co. v. Richardson 52 N.E. 86, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Stewart v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. 52 N.E. 89, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Collins v. Williams 52 N.E. 92, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. Engine v. Smith 52 N.E. 106, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Ream v. Goslee 52 N.E. 93, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Bockman v. Ritter 52 N.E. 100, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Miller v. Fuller 52 N.E. 101, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Shelburn Coal Mining Co. v. Delashmutt 52 N.E. 102, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- National Exchange Bank v. Berry 52 N.E. 104, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Hench v. Eacock 52 N.E. 85, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Frick Co. v. Barrett 52 N.E. 108, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Town of Sullivan v. Cluggage 52 N.E. 110, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Addison School Township v. School City of Shelbyville 52 N.E. 105, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Nordyke v. McCreery 52 N.E. 89, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Storms v. Storms 51 N.E. 955, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- McAfee v. Montgomery 51 N.E. 957, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Spegal v. Krag-Reynolds Co. 51 N.E. 959, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Pierce v. Pierce 51 N.E. 954, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- United States Express Co. v. Hammer 51 N.E. 953, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- State ex rel. Whistler v. Herod 51 N.E. 952, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Board of Commissioners v. Buchanan 51 N.E. 939, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Crouch v. Chamness 51 N.E. 941, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Flick v. State 51 N.E. 951, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Rau v. Ball Bros. Glass Manufacturing Co. 51 N.E. 945, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Mann v. Barkley 51 N.E. 946, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Meyer v. Green 51 N.E. 942, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- State v. Tincher 51 N.E. 943, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. Maus 51 N.E. 735, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Dugan 48 N.E. 238, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Eigenmann v. Clark 51 N.E. 725, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- McFarlan Carriage Co. v. Potter 51 N.E. 737, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Halleck v. Irwin 51 N.E. 731, (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)