Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Court of Appeals /

1909

254 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1909.

  • City of Greenfield v. Roback 90 N.E. 136, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Workman v. Bent 90 N.E. 85, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • City of Tipton v. Freeman 90 N.E. 101, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Donaldson v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners 90 N.E. 132, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rooker v. Bruce 90 N.E. 86, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Moore 90 N.E. 93, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pethtel v. Pethtel 90 N.E. 102, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Gilpin v. People's Bank 90 N.E. 91, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • American Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Holtam 90 N.E. 99, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Kunse v. Knights of Modern Maccabees 90 N.E. 89, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. Walsh 90 N.E. 138, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Biggs v. School City of Mount Vernon 90 N.E. 105, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hotmire v. O'Brien 90 N.E. 33, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Graves v. Garard 90 N.E. 22, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Town of Shirley v. Brewer 90 N.E. 21, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Dillman v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. 90 N.E. 22, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Polk v. Givens 90 N.E. 19, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Holliday & Wyon Co. v. O'Donnell 90 N.E. 24, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Indiana Stove Works v. Howden 90 N.E. 16, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Miami Coal Co. v. Kane 90 N.E. 13, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co. v. Newby 90 N.E. 29, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Sage v. International Harvester Co. of America 90 N.E. 17, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Furst v. Satterfield 89 N.E. 906, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Johns v. Town of Sheridan 89 N.E. 899, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Hatter 89 N.E. 912, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Kirkpatrick v. Van Cleave 89 N.E. 913, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Plaskett v. Benton-Warren Agricultural Society 89 N.E. 968, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Dieckman v. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. 89 N.E. 909, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Gordon v. Kaufman 89 N.E. 898, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Bowen v. W. O. Eaton & Co. 89 N.E. 961, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Gue v. St. John 89 N.E. 905, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rogers v. Rogers 89 N.E. 901, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Warner v. Jennings 89 N.E. 908, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Board of Finance of the School City v. People's National Bank 89 N.E. 904, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Maitlen v. Maitlen 89 N.E. 966, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Keener v. Grubb 89 N.E. 896, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hopp v. Luken 89 N.E. 916, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Conklin v. Dougherty 89 N.E. 893, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Mayer v. C. P. Lesh Paper Co. 89 N.E. 894, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ensley 89 N.E. 607, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Groff v. Warner 89 N.E. 609, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • City of Indianapolis v. Martin 89 N.E. 599, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Stough 89 N.E. 612, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Spade v. State 89 N.E. 604, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • International Building & Loan Ass'n v. Stark 89 N.E. 611, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Wulschner-Stewart Music Co. v. Hubbard 89 N.E. 794, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Saylor v. Obendorf 89 N.E. 600, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Remington 89 N.E. 614, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Gray v. Good 89 N.E. 498, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Roberts v. Dimmett 89 N.E. 496, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑