1909
254 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1909.
- Featherngill v. Dougherty 89 N.E. 521, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Swing v. Wellington 89 N.E. 514, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Welborn v. Kimmerling 89 N.E. 517, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Foudray v. Foudray 89 N.E. 499, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Purcell v. Hosey 89 N.E. 520, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Cook v. Ormsby 89 N.E. 525, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. Ohne 89 N.E. 507, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Freitag v. Chicago Junction Railway Co. 89 N.E. 501, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Pinnell v. Cutsinger 89 N.E. 493, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Remm v. Landon 89 N.E. 523, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. Heller 89 N.E. 419, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Bedford Coal & Coke Co. v. Parke County Coal Co. 89 N.E. 412, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Owen Creek Presbyterian Church v. Taggart 89 N.E. 406, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- C. Callahan Co. v. Wall Rice Milling Co. 89 N.E. 418, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Davis 89 N.E. 403, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Templeton v. Board of Commissioners 89 N.E. 410, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Thayer v. Kinder 89 N.E. 408, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Klitzke 89 N.E. 405, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Dondono v. City of Indianapolis 89 N.E. 421, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Cole Carriage Co. v. Hornbeck 89 N.E. 379, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Terre Haute Traction & Light Co. v. Payne 89 N.E. 413, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Hudspeth v. Kitchen 89 N.E. 375, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Flynn v. Northam 89 N.E. 326, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Columbia Creosoting Co. v. Beard 89 N.E. 321, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Terre Haute Water-Works Co. v. Highsmith 89 N.E. 324, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Green v. Felton 89 N.E. 320, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Pahde v. Pate 89 N.E. 321, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Vandalia Railroad v. Walsh 89 N.E. 320, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Keim v. Myers 89 N.E. 373, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Greener v. Niehaus 89 N.E. 377, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Southern Railway Co. v. Bufkins 89 N.E. 326, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- McCauley v. Schatzley 88 N.E. 972, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Faulkner v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad 89 N.E. 511, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Reed 88 N.E. 1080, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. Miller 88 N.E. 968, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Wysong v. Sells 88 N.E. 954, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Shiel 88 N.E. 957, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Paull v. Island Coal Co. 88 N.E. 959, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Jeffries v. Orndorf 88 N.E. 958, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Perry v. Acme Oil Co. 88 N.E. 859, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Farmers National Bank v. Coyner 88 N.E. 856, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Harmon v. Perkins 88 N.E. 961, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Bloch v. Crumpacker 88 N.E. 875, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. Smalley 88 N.E. 867, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Smith v. Miller 88 N.E. 859, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Indianapolis Terra Cotta Co. v. Wachstetter 88 N.E. 853, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ellison v. Branstrator 88 N.E. 963, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Swing v. Hill 88 N.E. 721, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Beck v. Budd 88 N.E. 785, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Smith v. Pyle 88 N.E. 733, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)