1909
254 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1909.
- State v. Ross 88 N.E. 734, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Cronin v. Zimmerman 88 N.E. 718, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Southern Railway Co. v. McNeeley 88 N.E. 710, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Felt v. Mitchell 88 N.E. 723, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Stewart v. White 88 N.E. 716, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ziehm v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. 88 N.E. 707, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Jennings v. Shertz 88 N.E. 729, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck 88 N.E. 627, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Neyens v. Flesher 88 N.E. 626, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Prather v. Brandon 88 N.E. 700, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Southern Railway Co. v. Hazlewood 88 N.E. 636, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ackerman v. Hawkins 88 N.E. 616, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Drennen 88 N.E. 724, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Taylor 88 N.E. 631, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Berkemeier v. State ex rel. Noelting 88 N.E. 634, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Garretson v. Garretson 88 N.E. 624, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Paul Manufacturing Co. v. Racine 88 N.E. 529, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Anderson v. Nesbitt 88 N.E. 523, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Linton 88 N.E. 532, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. Miller 88 N.E. 526, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Stauffer v. Martin 88 N.E. 363, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Casey v. Luken 88 N.E. 347, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Tilson v. Hoosier Tropical Fruit Co. 88 N.E. 524, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- United Oil & Gas Co. v. Ellsworth 88 N.E. 362, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Kamman v. D'Heur & Swain Lumber Co. 88 N.E. 348, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Smith v. Long 88 N.E. 356, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Ohio Oil Co. v. Westfall 88 N.E. 354, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Vandalia Railroad v. Adams 88 N.E. 353, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. Thomas 88 N.E. 356, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Burgett v. Loeb 88 N.E. 346, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Farmers' Mutual v. Reser 88 N.E. 353, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Stepp 88 N.E. 343, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Goff v. Kokomo Brass Works 88 N.E. 312, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Collins Coal Co. v. De Pugh 88 N.E. 317, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- United Oil & Gas Co. v. Alberson 88 N.E. 359, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Masepohl v. Heimbach 88 N.E. 316, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Bennett v. West 88 N.E. 309, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Taylor v. Bond 88 N.E. 311, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Cooper v. Cooper 88 N.E. 341, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Wise v. Wise 88 N.E. 309, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Leonard v. Honisfager 88 N.E. 91, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Eikman v. Landwehr 88 N.E. 105, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Hymera Coal Mining Co. v. Mahan 88 N.E. 108, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Computing Cheese Cutter Co. v. Dunn 88 N.E. 93, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- American Building & Loan Ass'n v. Fowler 88 N.E. 118, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Heritage v. State ex rel. Crim 88 N.E. 114, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Clarke v. Evansville Boat Club 88 N.E. 100, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Fox v. Rhodes 88 N.E. 92, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Shank v. Trustees of McCordsville Lodge No. 338 88 N.E. 85, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
- Brown v. American Steel & Wire Co. 88 N.E. 80, (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)