Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Court of Appeals /

1912

254 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1912.

  • Miller v. Farmers State Bank 100 N.E. 119, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Miller v. Sharp 100 N.E. 108, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Craig v. Zent 100 N.E. 94, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Miller v. Hogshire 100 N.E. 121, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Miller v. Bank of Advance 100 N.E. 121, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Miller v. Mellette 100 N.E. 121, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • A. D. Baker Co. v. Smedley 100 N.E. 307, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Carmichael v. Arms 100 N.E. 302, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Manning v. Wilson 100 N.E. 106, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • City of Evansville v. Pifer 100 N.E. 110, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Henry v. Hack 100 N.E. 116, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Citizens Telephone Co. v. Fort Wayne & Springfield Railway Co. 100 N.E. 309, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Tucker v. Eastridge 100 N.E. 113, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Barnes v. Stock 100 N.E. 98, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. Duling 100 N.E. 96, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Bartholomew v. Grimes 100 N.E. 12, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Wheeler v. State 100 N.E. 25, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. True 100 N.E. 22, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Burley Tobacco Society v. Gillaspy 100 N.E. 89, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • North v. Jones 100 N.E. 84, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • H. A. McCowen & Co. v. Gorman 100 N.E. 31, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. Reeder 100 N.E. 101, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. Poling 100 N.E. 83, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Goff v. Craig 99 N.E. 1013, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hurst v. Mann 99 N.E. 828, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • German Fire Insurance v. Greenwald 99 N.E. 1011, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Board of Commissioners v. Hall 99 N.E. 1009, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Calahan v. Dunker 99 N.E. 1021, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Benbow v. Studebaker 99 N.E. 1033, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Michigan Central Railroad v. Farrell 99 N.E. 1026, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street Railroad 99 N.E. 1018, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Watt v. Mishawaka Paper & Pulp Co. 99 N.E. 1029, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Lawrence v. Oliver Typewriter Co. 99 N.E. 809, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Columbia Creosoting Co. v. Beard Administrator 99 N.E. 823, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Harrod v. Littell 99 N.E. 817, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Norman v. State ex rel. Hotz 99 N.E. 812, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Masters v. Abbitt 99 N.E. 815, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • National Biscuit Co. v. Wilson 99 N.E. 819, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hall v. Allfree 99 N.E. 813, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Holthouse v. Poling 99 N.E. 810, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • National Fire Proofing Co. v. Smith 99 N.E. 829, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Ohio Farmers Insurance v. Bell 99 N.E. 812, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cadle v. McIntosh 99 N.E. 779, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cooper v. Cooper 99 N.E. 782, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Judy v. Woods 99 N.E. 792, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Huffman v. Huffman 99 N.E. 769, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cleveland v. Emerson 99 N.E. 796, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Clinton Paying Brick Co. 99 N.E. 768, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Clark 99 N.E. 777, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Crone 99 N.E. 762, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑