Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920

Union Traction Co. v. Wolf

Union Traction Co. v. Wolf
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided June 2, 1920 · No. 10 · Nichols
73 Ind. App. 392; 127 N.E. 564; 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 132
Union Traction Co. v. Wolf

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Nichols, J.

Appellee has failed to file any brief. 'It has been repeatedly held by this court and by the Supreme Court that a failure on the part of the appellee to file a brief may be treated as a confession of error, warranting reversal. Eigelsbach v. Kanne (1915), 184 Ind. 62, 110 N. E. 549; Huddleston v. Huddleston (1916), 184 Ind. 168, 110 N. E. 980; Veit v. Windhorst (1916), 184 Ind. 351, 110 N. E. 666. Having examined *393appellant’s brief, we are satisfied that in this case the rule should be invoked.

Judgment reversed, with instruction to the trial court to grant a new trial.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.