Salinger v. Rupel
Salinger v. Rupel
78 Ind. App. 197; 135 N.E. 179; 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 93
Salinger v. Rupel
Opinion of the Court
— Appellant appeals from a decree foreclosing a mechanic’s lien, and in support of his assignment of errors and brief in support thereof has made a prima facie showing of reversible errors. Appellee has filed no brief and under the circumstances we will treat such failure as a confession of errors.
The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.