Schultz v. Rennick
Schultz v. Rennick
82 Ind. App. 606
Schultz v. Rennick
Opinion of the Court
(after making the foregoing statement) :
We are of the opinion that, as against the objections stated in the memorandum, the complaint is good. Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeill (1919), 188 Ind. 432; Bailey v. London Guarantee, etc., Co. (1918), 72 Ind. App. 84. The court did not err in overruling the motion to arrest judgment.
The judgment is affirmed
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.