Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925

Schultz v. Rennick

Schultz v. Rennick
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided April 1, 1925 · Dausman
82 Ind. App. 606

Schultz v. Rennick

Opinion of the Court

Dausman, C. J.

(after making the foregoing statement) :

We are of the opinion that, as against the objections stated in the memorandum, the complaint is good. Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeill (1919), 188 Ind. 432; Bailey v. London Guarantee, etc., Co. (1918), 72 Ind. App. 84. The court did not err in overruling the motion to arrest judgment.

The judgment is affirmed

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.