Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929

Schoonover v. Carpenter Construction Co.

Schoonover v. Carpenter Construction Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided March 8, 1929 · PER CURIAM.
165 N.E. 926; 89 Ind. App. 713; 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 254 (North Eastern Reporter)

Schoonover v. Carpenter Construction Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed, and ten per cent damages assessed.

Addendum

On Petition for Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

There is merit in appellee’s contention that appellant has failed to comply with Rule 29 with reference to filing petitions for rehearing, and therefore has failed to present any question for rehearing. However, after consideration, the court concludes to remit the penalty assessed against appellant in its decision. With this modification the decision of the court affirming the judgment stands.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.