This action was brought by appellee against appellant for possession of certain real estate in the city of Gary, Indiana, and for damages for its unlawful detention. From a judgment for appellee, appellant appeals, assigning as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

Under this assignment appellant lists a number of technical points but they may be summarized as follows: (1) appellee failed to prove that it is a corporation; (2) appellee’s witness as to rental value was not qualified; ■and (3) appellant failed to receive a proper notice of the termination of his lease.

We find no merit in any of appellant’s contentions and see no purpose to be served in lengthening this opinion by a detailed recital of the evidence. It is sufficient to say that an examination of the record discloses ample evidence, (1) that appellee is a corporation; (2) that appellee’s witness as to rental value was fully qualified; and (3) that appellant received the notice of termination of his lease as required and provided for in that instrument itself.

Judgment affirmed.

Draper, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 70 N. E. (2d) 357.