LaSalle Extension University v. Kronewitter
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Deckard v. Indiana State School Building Authority (Ind. 1954)
- Parliament v. Taber (Ind. Ct. App. 1951)
- Harlos v. Currie (Ind. Ct. App. 1951)
- Stutz v. Used Car Loan Co. (Ind. Ct. App. 1949)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the St. Joseph Superior Court No. 1. The assignment of errors here is as follows:
“1. Court’s decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence;
“2. Court’s decision is contrary to law.”
Appellee has filed his motion to affirm the judgment on the grounds that no question has been presented by the above assignment of errors. The motion will have to be sustained. Burns’ 1946 Replacement, § 2-2401; Van Buskirk et al. v. Stover (1904), 162 Ind. *342 448, 70 N. E. 520; Zimmerman v. Gaumer et al. (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555, 53 N. E. 829.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 86 N. E. 2d 707.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.