Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983

Curtis v. Coleman

Curtis v. Coleman
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided January 12, 1983 · Robertson, Ratliff, Neal
443 N.E.2d 890; 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2511 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Curtis v. Coleman

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue raised in this interlocutory appeal is whether a maternal grandmother can obtain court ordered visitation rights *891 with her granddaughter pursuant to the provisions of Ind.Code 31-1-11.7-2. Under the facts of this case, we hold that she cannot.

The statute permits the court to order grandparent visitation in two instances; one where a parent is deceased and the other being where the parent’s marriage has been dissolved. Neither situation exists here.

As Judge Neal recently stated in the case of In Re: The Visitation of J.O., (1982) Ind.App., 441 N.E.2d 991:

As a court, we are constrained to uphold the plain meaning of the statute and to carry out the true intent of the legislature. . Thompson v. Thompson, (1972) 259 Ind. 266, 286 N.E.2d 657; In the Matter of the Estate of Wisely, (1980) Ind.App., 402 N-E.2d 14. We hold that the Grandparent’s Visitation Statute limits third-party grandparents seeking visitation rights to the above-described two instances, ...

The trial court erred in setting aside its ruling on summary judgment.

Judgment reversed.

RATLIFF and NEAL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.