Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983

Dougherty v. State

Dougherty v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided July 28, 1983 · Conover, Miller, Young
462 N.E.2d 212 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Dougherty v. State

Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

CONOVER, Presiding Judge.

James T. Dougherty (Dougherty) petitions for rehearing, claiming our opinion on his appeal is erroneous. Dougherty v. State, (1983) Ind.App. 451 N.E.2d 382. However, his petition is insufficient. Like that filed in Mikesell v. Mikesell, (1982) Ind.App., 436 N.E.2d 95, it

... contains no separate assignment of appellate error, rather it discusses in argumentative narrative the reasons they believe our prior decision is erroneous.
By failing to set out separately a concise assignment of appellate error, the appellants/petitioners have failed to comply with the requirements of Ind.Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 11(A).

Id. at 96. Failure to comply with this rule warrants dismissal. Therefore, Dougherty’s petition for rehearing is dismissed.

MILLER and YOUNG, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑